It's interesting, TexasZ3, just how image and quality are not always closely related. Without naming brands, one of the most prestigious brands both in the late 1960s and now in the 21st century, used a particular rubber compound in their washing machines tub/shell gaskets (the horse collar shaped 'bellows-like' gasket that seals off the static outer tub and the casing of the machine in front loading designs). This component is critical in not only making sure that the water remains inside the machine and doesn't leak out in use, but it comes into intimate contact with the wash load inside. Any decomposition will mark the clothes as they rub against it during the wash cycle. My company's product used compounds that had been thoroughly tested both in our laboratories and in field trials and, unsurprisingly, the gasket on our machine scored very highly in durability tests. This other brand, one from a European manufacturer, was so badly decomposed that it was semi-liquid on completion. My subject is principally synthetic polymers commonly called plastics and the design and materials thereof so I can only speculate on this material, but I assume it had de-polymerised back to its tree sap origins.
Many 21st century products use a rubberised tactile coating. Binoculars, cameras, small electronic gadgets, all are given this surface finish. Who hasn't found an MP3 player, or pocket video camera, for example, that has lain idle in a drawer for some years and found it now coated in a sticky, glue-like substance? This ruins a perfectly useable item in the name of point-of-sale quality feel.